Mark Twain once quipped, “Reports of my demise have been greatly exaggerated.” The same can probably be said of the often expressed idea that 8-bit microcontrollers are in decline. The reality appears to be that despite the competition from low-cost, low-power 32-bit MCUs, 8-bit MCUs are not only holding their own in the embedded market race, they are getting their second wind.
It's easy to see why one might think that 8-bit MCUs are a dying breed. The pace of technology advance has conditioned us to believe that anything more than a half-decade old has been rendered obsolete and that in a few more years will become unavailable as vendors turn their production resources over to newer products. Further, 32-bit processors have been dropping in price and have become available in sizes that rival that of 8-bit MCUs, reducing those former 8-bit advantages. We thus expect 8-bit processing to fade away.
There is data to support this expectation. The annual embedded market study that UBM (EDN's parent company) conducts has survey results showing a steady trend over the last five years: 8-bit and 16-bit MCU use is declining while 32-bit is on the rise.
But as has been pointed out to me by Microchip and other champions of 8-bit processing, these ideas and expectations miss a key point: embedded designs are not always based on a single processor. There are many benefits to splitting off some kinds of functionality into smaller, autonomous processors to simplify the design and operation of applications programs. Why compound the difficulty of handling a critical industrial control task, for instance, by burdening the central processor with the petty details of handling a display system at the same time? Carve out the user IO task and give it to another processor to handle.
These 8-bit champions make a good point. While 32-bit use is on the rise, so is multiple processor design, and 8-bit use there may not be getting the recognition it deserves. Even the UBM survey would miss 8-bit use. The survey question asks “What was the main processor you used in your most recent design?” (emphasis added). This completely ignores the question of what secondary processors a design may contain. It has also been pointed out to me that 8-bit designs tend to be completed more quickly than 32-bit designs, and the question only asks about the most recent project, not how many projects they completed this year.
There have also been a couple of things that show me 8-bit design is in growth mode rather than decline.
“In the middle of my “Not Your Grandmother's Embedded Systems” presentation I say “in the next four slides we'll consider embedded systems 10, 20, 50, and 100 years from now” …nnEach slide starts off with “Experts predict the death of 8-bit proces
“Suppose that you have a complex 100,000 line program running on a 32-bit MCU and you need to guarantee that several time-critical interrupt sources are always serviced in a timely fashion. One approach would be to offload the time-critical tasks to one or
“Bob, exactly the point. Our survey doesn't capture such use of the 8-bit MCU, which is part of why it shows a decline in 8-bit use. But that's a decline in 8-bit as the primary processor. What I am hearing, as you indicate, is that 8-bit is tackling suppo
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
You must verify your email address before signing in. Check your email for your verification email, or enter your email address in the form below to resend the email.
Please confirm the information below before signing in.
{* #socialRegistrationForm *}
{* firstName *}
{* lastName *}
{* displayName *}
{* emailAddress *}
By clicking "Sign In", you confirm that you accept our terms of service and have read and understand privacy policy.
{* /socialRegistrationForm *}
Almost Done
Please confirm the information below before signing in. Already have an account? Sign In.
“In the middle of my “Not Your Grandmother's Embedded Systems” presentation I say “in the next four slides we'll consider embedded systems 10, 20, 50, and 100 years from now” …nnEach slide starts off with “Experts predict the death of 8-bit proces
“Suppose that you have a complex 100,000 line program running on a 32-bit MCU and you need to guarantee that several time-critical interrupt sources are always serviced in a timely fashion. One approach would be to offload the time-critical tasks to one or
“Bob, exactly the point. Our survey doesn't capture such use of the 8-bit MCU, which is part of why it shows a decline in 8-bit use. But that's a decline in 8-bit as the primary processor. What I am hearing, as you indicate, is that 8-bit is tackling suppo