Building an efficient, intelligent, and flexible thermal management system

The rapid growth of hardware-based systems has increased the need for efficient thermal management systems (TMS). A simple TMS can be an on/off thermostatic controller that switches a fan on when the temperature reaches a certain limit and turns it off when the temperature drops below the set threshold. However, sensitive electronic devices such as routers, switches, servers, and medical equipment require a more complex TMS approach to ensure that operation lies within the safe temperature range consistently. The fundamental processes involved in a TMS are illustrated in Figure 1 .

Figure 1: Basic block diagram of a TMS

Temperature Sensors: A wide-range of both analog and digital sensors can be used for measuring temperature. Commonly used sensors include thermistors, resistance temperature detectors (RTDs), thermocouples, and temperature sensor ICs. The choice of sensor depends upon the required range and precision of the temperature readings. Multiple sensors of various types can be used together for more accurate measurements.

Sensor Interface: The temperature sensor interface can be another limiting factor. Analog sensors require signal conditioning (i.e., noise removal and amplification) and analog-to-digital conversion before temperature values can be fed to the MCU for processing. On the other hand, digital sensors require the availability of I/O that supports communication protocols such as I2C, SPI, or 1-wire.

Temperature control algorithm:  Running fans at their maximum speed can provide the best cooling effect but will consume a lot of power and produce acoustic noise. Furthermore, this reduces the lifetime of the fan. To increase the efficiency of the system, temperature control algorithms implemented on an MCU can run the fan at an optimal speed to balance cooling, noise produced, and operating life.

Fan Controller: The fan controller provides an interface to the MCU and, given the required speed by the MCU, drives the fan using a pulse width modulated (PWM) signal. The fan controller adjusts the PWM duty cycle to control the speed of the fan. Fan control can either be open loop or closed loop. In case of open loop fan control, the controller changes the duty cycle of the fan control signal without knowing whether fans are reaching the desired speeds. Closed loop control incorporates feedback from the fans to the controller to ensure the fans are running as expected. In addition, this feedback can be used to alert the MCU if there is a fault condition (i.e., fan stall or locked rotor).

Fans: Brushless DC (BLDC) fans are the most commonly used fans for cooling purposes. These fans come in different sizes, voltage ratings, and number of wires. The 2-wire fans are the simplest ones, with voltage connections only, while the 3-wire fans have an additional wire that provides the fan speed. The design of a TMS can significantly vary, based on specifications such as space constraints, maximum allowable noise, cooling requirements, and power consumption.

Building a TMS using a Programmable System on Chip
Today programmable system on chip (PSoC) technology brings high levels of integration to microcontrollers to allow a single-chip approach to TMS design. For example, instead of separate fan controller circuitry, the fan controller can be implemented using programmable digital blocks present inside the SoC device running independent of the MCU sub-system. Moreover, PSoC devices provides the capability of interfacing with a number of digital sensors and other peripherals such as LCDs.

A PSoC device can serve as a more efficient alternative to the dedicated IC approach because of its mixed-signal functionality. It allows the digital peripherals to be configured by the user through an MCU sub-system. The configuration can be changed at run time as per the requirements thereby enhancing the flexibility. Moreover, several ICs, temperature sensors, and GPIOs can be integrated with the PSoC to build a complete TMS (Figure 2 ).

Figure 2: Implementation of a TMS on Cypress’ PSoC 3 device

The PSoC is fed with the data acquired from the various types of temperature sensors to which it is interfaced. Different resources present inside the PSoC are used to interpret this data. Input from the analog sensors is filtered and quantized to convert it into the appropriate digital format while the data from digital sensors requires I2C/SPI interfacing with the MCU. Temperature readings are stored in EEPROM for event logging. Other peripherals, such as an LCD or UART, can be used to display fan speeds, temperature, and other necessary information. Both open loop and closed loop implementations are possible with PSoCs. In the case of closed loop control, the tachometer signal from the fan and an internal timer are used to calculate the RPM-speed of the fan.

Firmware and Hardware Fan control: A PSoC-based TMS also supports both firmware and hardware fan control. With complete firmware control, the MCU is responsible for the entire process, from measuring the temperature to PWM generation. This method is unsuitable when multiple sensors and fans need to be interfaced with the TMS because of the limited resources of the MCU itself. Furthermore, closed loop control will slow down the responsiveness of the TMS.

An approach using partial firmware and hardware fan control can be implemented using an array of small programmable devices called UDBs present inside the PSoC architecture. A UDB contains two small PLDs, a datapath, and status and control logic as shown in Figure 3 . The routing channel consists of an extensive signal routing system called the Digital System Interconnect (DSI) connecting UDB arrays to MCU, DMA controller, I/O pins, global clocks, etc. UDBs are smaller than a complete CPLD or FPGA but can efficiently perform calculations, comparisons, and other data management tasks at hardware-based rates.

Figure 3: Block diagram of a UDB

With partial firmware fan control, PWM generation and fan speed monitoring is offloaded to the UDBs. The MCU still fully manages speed control. As shown in Figure 4(a) , the MCU repeatedly calculates the target speed and sets the PWM duty-cycle based on the fan’s current speed.

With complete hardware-based fan control, the duty-cycle is calculated within the UDBs with no intervention from the MCU. The MCU can set the desired speed but the UDBs are responsible for adjusting the PWM duty-cycle to maintain that speed as show in Figure 4(b) . This frees up the MCU and enables it to perform other important tasks.

Figure 4(a): Partial Firmware control

Figure 4(b): Hardware control

Fan Controller: Programmable SoC devices can also implement morecomplex functionality through the use of custom code or production-readylibraries. For example, Cypress’ PSoC Creator provides a Fan Controllercomponent that encapsulates all the necessary hardware blocks for fancontrol including PWMs, fan tachometer capture timer, control and statusregisters, and a DMA controller. Developers can also customize the FanController component by entering specifications such as the number offans, fan bank organization, and duty-cycle required for a certainRPM-speed. One instance of the customizer can be seen in Figure 5 .

Figure 5: Customizer of the Fan Controller component in PSoC Creator

Afterthe system specifications have been entered, the tool maps the designonto physical hardware to efficiently utilize available processingresources for an optimal implementation with minimal firmwaredevelopment.

The schematic of an example TMS using the Fan Controller component is shown in Figure 6 .Two Fan Controller components are configured to control the speeds ofsixteen fans with partial firmware control. The duty cycles of theoutput PWMs are changed depending on the respective tachometer input(tach1, tach2, …, tach16). The speed of the fans is measured andcorresponding action is taken to adjust it.


Click on image to enlarge.
Figure 6: Implementing fan control in PSoC using PSoC Creator

Closedloop control helps reduce acoustic noise and power consumption byrotating the fan at optimal speeds. Moreover, with the help of digitalperipherals like UDBs and DMAs, complete fan control is possible withoutMCU intervention. This reduces MCU usage enabling it to independentlyperform other tasks. Decentralized control also makes the TMS morerobust. Even if the MCU malfunctions, the TMS does not collapse and willkeep running independently.

The highly integrated nature ofPSoC devices combines the flexibility of an MCU with digital and analogprocessing capabilities in a single chip. This reduces BOM cost andallows the TMS to be more compact so it can fit in smaller enclosures.In addition, because the PSoC is not fixed in functionality, designs canbe even more flexible. For example, in systems such as networkingswitches and routers, power supervision is required to accuratelymonitor voltage rails within a system.

Figure 7: Using Programmable Analog and Digital for System Management

Thistraditionally requires additional external ICs in order to implementthis functionality. With a programmable SoC, both thermal management andintelligent power supervision can be implemented in a single device toreduce overall cost and increase reliability. In addition, many featuressuch as multiple PMBus interfaces and EEPROM fault logging can be addedor removed from the same device across multiple designs. Figure 7 above shows how the same device used for only thermal management can beexpanded into an all-inclusive system supporting power supervision aswell.

The thermal management functions and capabilities of aPSoC-based TMS can be evaluated by integrating the CY8CKIT-030Development Kit (DVK) with the PSoC-3 device. Figure 8 shows the snapshot of the Evaluation board with some key components labeled.


Click on image to enlarge.
Figure 8: CY8CKIT-030 Development Kit

Asma Afzal is currently pursuing her Master’s degree in Electrical Engineeringfrom National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Pakistan,and she has been working on embedded systems development for a couple ofyears. Currently, she is working as a Research Associate at CY-SEECSJoint Research Center at NUST in Islamabad, Pakistan. Her recent workinvolves the optimization of various types of encryption schemes.

Dr. Khawar Khurshid is the Joint Director of CY-SEECS Joint Research Center at NUST inIslamabad, Pakistan. Dr. Khurshid obtained his doctorate degree fromMichigan State University in Biomedical Imaging Systems and is currentlyheading the Institute of Applied Electronics and Computers at NationalUniversity of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Pakistan. Dr. Khurshidspecializes in Medical Imaging, Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition,Image and Signal Processing with research interests in the areas ofBiomedical Imaging Modalities, Volumetric Data Visualization, MultimediaEncoding, and System design for depth and free viewpoint videoprocessing.

Ahmed Majeed Khan develops thermalmanagement and power supervision solutions at Cypress Semiconductor. Healso established CY-SEECS Joint Research Center at National Universityof Sciences and Technology (NUST) in Islamabad, Pakistan. He holds an MSin Electrical Engineering from Michigan State University and has over 8years of experience working with microcontrollers and embeddedapplications.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.