Code of Ethics -

Code of Ethics

With the advent of a new year, it’s not a bad time to step back and think about first principles.

After 40 years of being an engineer I’ve come to view this as a truly noble profession, one in which we change the world, often radically, and more often than not for the good. The America of my youth would be unrecognizable to young people today, changed in no small way by entirely new technologies invented and perfected by members of our profession. Today engineers are developing ideas that will surely continue to improve the lot of the human race.

Some will counter that there’s blowback; that sometimes our products have unanticipated and undesirable side-effects. That’s true, of course. We’re human and not smart enough to know everything. But I remain a technology optimist. We will figure this stuff out.

Others will complain that the ideas are mismatched to their intended use; in a recent radio diatribe the “expert” claimed the Gates Foundation’s efforts to invent an accessible toilet for the poorest of the world was a lousy idea because, at $1k each, none of those people could afford it. But every development effort goes through evolution and change; some will fail; but those guaranteed to fail are those never started.

Then there’s the boss who makes demands which may lead to dangerous devices. Most engineers are employees and their paycheck is to some degree (we’re always free to quit) held hostage by those more concerned about the bottom line than more important issues.

It’s important that we always hold true to certain base truths. For instance, I keep a copy of the US Constitution on my phone as it represents the ideal of whom we want to be as a nation. No matter how you feel about all of the crazy stuff in the news, there’s so much smoke and FUD that it’s easy to get swept up in the hysteria. Referring to our most important founding document grounds the discussion.

Similarly, in engineering we do have some documents that should ground our professional behavior. None are perfect, but they have some good insights. I like the IEEE’s Code of Ethics . Another good one is the Statement of Ethical Principles from the Royal Academy of Engineering .

In engineering we’re always trying to improve; to continue to learn new things, to use better processes, and, if we’re wise, to audit and improve, if necessary, our ethical behavior. In management this would be called continuous improvement.

What do you think? How do you balance the external forces that want to drive you from where you ethically want to be?

Jack G. Ganssle is a lecturer and consultant on embedded developmentissues. He conducts seminars on embedded systems and helps companieswith their embedded challenges, and works as an expert witness onembedded issues. Contact him at . His website is.

5 thoughts on “Code of Ethics

  1. I generally like to think of myself as a reasonably ethical person, but When I look at the IEEE code of ethics I don't make the bar. I doubt many would.

    I have developed software that was used by organisations that spy on people (Google, NSA and others).

    Log in to Reply
  2. But back to the point raised near the top. I too am a technology optimist, but we have generally got beyond solving technological problems. Most of our problems are people problems, not technological limitations, and thus technological advances don't fix

    Log in to Reply
  3. President Eisenhower suffered a heart attack on Sept 24, 1955, during his first term in office. He undoubtedly received the best medical care available at the time, which probably consisted of little more than nitroglycerine tablets and bed rest. Healthcar

    Log in to Reply
  4. There have been several occasions when my bosses have asked “Can you do this?” and my reply has been something like “Physically yes I can do it, but I don't think it is legal.” After a quick explanation why I don't think it is legal they have never asked

    Log in to Reply
  5. Engineering is where Art and Technology meet. Good Art is usually something original, clever, or otherwise new. Bad Art usually fades away pretty quickly.

    Good technology is science in action where the simplist, most functional and elegant solution wins

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.