Planning for longevity -

Planning for longevity

Click here for reader response to thisarticle

Time is a cruel mistress. That, combined with our industry's throwaway nature, means our cultural archives and discoveries are in jeopardy. In 1066 William, the illegitimate son of the Duke of Normandy, invaded England and defeated King Harold at the Battle of Hastings. The nation's nobles weren't too thrilled with this French usurper, so William cleverly cut their power base by introducing feudalism. Though Europe had known feudalism for centuries it had never before been tried in England. Serfs (villeins) pledged loyalty to the King, not to their local lord, diminishing the lord's power. William scattered castles and manors far apart to prevent any one lord from aggregating authority. Over the next two decades he deposed all but two of the noblemen who had survived Hastings, replacing them with his own French followers.

Instead of trusting the local lords to remit enough in taxes William commissioned the Domesday Book, a record of virtually all property in the nation. By 1086 it listed over 13,000 places, detailing wealth down to the last pig. The name derived from the Medieval English spelling of “doomsday,” and meant “the book of unalterable judgments.” The original 900-year-old book is still in fine condition in the Public Record Office in Kew, London.

But not so its digital rendering, created at a cost of £2.5 million in 1986. In just a couple of decades the technology needed to read the antique pair of videodisks disappeared.

When we rely on technology to preserve important information we're betting on stasis, a stability that just does not exist in this fast-paced industry. Everything changes, all the time.

File formats become obsolete. What will happen to our picture collections when some new holographic format replaces JPEGs and GIFs? Someone will surely write a translator of debatable accuracy, but that's doomed to failure for more complex file types. Even a simple upgrade from one version of Word to another nearly always brings up page formatting or other issues in complex documents. Imagining the difficulty of writing a translator for database files with lots of interrelated links and scripting capabilities makes my head hurt.

Hardware disappears. NASA is reputedly scrounging eBay for x86 boards needed to maintain Shuttle ground support equipment.

Applications fade away. Do you have any files created in Wordstar or less popular word processors of the late '70s? Feed 'em to the virtual fire. Without the application, there's little hope of reading the files.

People quit or die, taking vast hoards of critical, undocumented knowledge with them. In the '80s my former employer called in a panic. They needed one simple change to the 8008-based instrument we had delivered a dozen years before. I managed to resurrect the original development system, rebuild a teletype, and edit the punched paper-tape source files, all of which were brittle and flaking with age. The company wasn't willing to pay to transfer those “files” to disk so I'm sure the code all disappeared within a short time.

And media change so fast that anyone using CDs or DVDs for long-term preservation is guaranteed to amass a “Roach Motel” library. You can check in, but you can never check out. A few years ago I was startled to find 8-inch floppies in the safe, next to a stack of 5.25-inch disks. My current computer has a 3.5-inch drive that has never been used. In the '70s we kept critical data on removable 14-inch hard drive platters, packing a whopping 5MB per disk. I bet those would be tough to read today. Before that, well, punched cards were everywhere. Now, even if the cards weren't unusably brittle from age, how would you suck the data off of these?

Reliable backups
An entire industry exists simply to warehouse data. No doubt lots of that saved material is paper, but if their customers archive disks, I hope they intend the warehouse for short-term storage only. Those carefully-preserved storage media will soon be rendered unreadable and worthless by advancing technology.

We're building our digital heritage on the quicksand of electronic systems that intrinsically have no permanence. Librarians and preservationists are searching for solutions that can survive for centuries. That's a problem beyond my ken, but we practicing engineers do need a way to safeguard our source files. For embedded systems last forever. I often see products with 20+-year-old designs, still being manufactured and still benefiting from occasional firmware improvements.

The three elements to keeping systems maintainable for many years are reliable backups, a program that carefully manages the use and eventual preservation of the tools, and conserving the project's documentation.

Microsoft claims that over 40% of small businesses back up their critical data less frequently than once a month and 27% never bother with a backup.1 Hey, backups are sort of annoying, and we code jockeys never do anything that's not fun, cool, and exciting, right?

So it seems. Poking around too many companies I've found that (so far) all embedded systems outfits do have some sort of backup strategy. But an astonishing number of engineers really don't know what's preserved. Few companies, unless there's a functioning IT group, ever bother to test the backups on a regular basis. They might as well be sending the data to a write-only memory, because backups, like all systems, do fail.2

Only totally nave or very gutsy companies expect engineers to preserve their own data. We're good at a lot of things, but for some reason too many of us forget or defer making backups. Bosses motivate, browbeat, and yell at the engineers to copy everything to tape once in a while, but somehow this never becomes an integral part of our psyche. The only solution is the company's version control system (VCS).

Nearly all of us do use a VCS. If you don't, start now. This is the most fundamental tool of all, even for a one person organization. The VCS does allow us to recreate old versions and get change information, of course. But it's also a central database that maintains the entire project's build information. It lives on a server somewhere, one that's backed up every night. The developers might (will) forget to save their data, but if they're careful to extract only the code they need from the database then nearly everything is saved daily. Sure, a code terrorist could check out vast chunks of software. But one of a project leader's most important responsibilities is a weekly check of the VCS's logs to see if programmers are hoarding code.

The VCS is a dynamic part of the business. When the server migrates to a next-generation processor the database goes with it, stored on the current hard-disk technology. Backup media might change from a 3.5-inch floppy in years past to a 100-petabyte optical-storage cube, but this medium is only intended to handle short-term crashes. The goodies are on the hard disk, not locked in some dusty safe somewhere. Old and obsolete projects reside in the database along with the latest development effort. Media obsolescence is not a problem.

Do be wary of IT people who claim the backups are entirely under control. I've visited too many companies that lost big chunks of important data because some problem didn't come to light until the server's disk crashed. Does IT back up daily? To what? Where are the media kept? Are the tapes or disks changed every day? How often is a backup tested—actually rolled into the server and examined?

While RAID (Redundant Array of Independent [or Inexpensive] Disks) is a nice system, the disks all live in the same room as the server. A fire destroys the original data and the redundant copies. Use a removable backup. Tapes, CDs, and DVDs are the prevalent media, though large-capacity FireWire disk drives are cheap and fast.

CDs don't hold much but have become so cheap that smaller organizations and consultancies rely heavily on them. I can just fit my critical docs onto one CD. DVDs, now only a buck apiece or less, hold a lot more data and are just as easy to use. But both media suffer from a variety of ills. Originally advertised to offer 100 years of service, many of us can now peer through the eroded metal in some of our music collection's disks.

CDs have three layers: a thick polycarbonate base, the metal layer, and a very thin bit of lacquer deposited on the top, or label, side. That final layer is quite delicate and much more sensitive to damage than the polycarbonate.

DVDs are hardier. The metal is sandwiched between two glued-together equally thick polycarbonate layers. But that glue joint is subject to failure. Bend the disk when extracting it from the jewel case and you run the risk of the glue pulling some of the metal apart.

DVDs, CDs, and tapes should be kept in a cool, dry place when not being used. ANSI standard IT9.13 suggests keeping them at a constant 65 to 70°F and 45 to 50% relative humidity (RH). Widely fluctuating temperature or RH severely shortens the life span of all recordings. Environmental conditions must not fluctuate more that ±10°F or ±10% RH over a 24-hour period. Keep recordings away from light, especially sunlight and unshielded fluorescent lights.

Keep these media in their individual cases to buffer rapid environmental changes and protect them from airborne contaminants. Don't substitute paper sleeves for the cases; DVD and CD jewel boxes keep the disk from contacting the case. Remove paper materials, which tend to attract and absorb water.

Label CDs and DVDs with a xylene-free marker like the Staedtler Lumocolor CD/DVD Markers (available from office-supply firms). Xylene will eat the lacquer layer. Never use a fine point marker, which may dent the lacquer. It's best to write on the inner hub where there's no metal and, thus, no data.

Store disks vertically, like a book. On their side they may bow. And don't use paper labels on disks stored for more than about five years, as the paper can absorb moisture, inducing more bowing.

Never use rewriteable CDs or DVDs for long-term storage as they contain a heat-sensitive layer that decays much faster than the metal layers of cheaper write-once products.

Manage your tools
Ten years have elapsed since releasing that once-cool Colorimeter 1994. A major customer wants a change. Can you even find the compiler's original disks? Are they readable? Where will you get a 5.25-inch drive?

You call the vendor. They're out of business or don't support that product anymore. Or maybe you can install the ancient tools but discover that the compiler, which once ran under DOS or Windows 3.1, crashes under XP.

At the end of any project, preserve your tools. Check them into the VCS. They'll only consume disk space, which costs nothing today. Save everything—make and project files, locate maps, every scrap of binary that's associated with the product.

Disks are cheap. Even my home machine has 400GB.

Don't toss old computers. When it's time to replace a PC, emulator, or ROM burner, lock the devices in a closet, intact, with users' manuals, cables, and all accessories. These devices have zero value by the time you're ready to upgrade them, so the cost to the company is nothing.

Avoid upgrading operating systems. It's probably cheaper to replace a computer with a pre-installed operating system than to wipe the disk and reload everything. You'll probably forget to move some critical utility anyway, so it'll be lost forever. Buy a new machine, put both machines on the network, and copy all of your goodies across. Store the old computer in the closet with the other bits of antiquity. New operating-system releases are a good time to replace the hardware anyway.

A lot of tools hook themselves deeply into your computer's guts via licensing technologies like Macrovision's super-annoying Flex. Want to retire an old machine and port your tools to the latest 100 gigamegaweeniehertz Pentium 15? Forget it. I want that old box in the closet, loaded, and ready to go, even if it sits idle for years. Perhaps one solution is to get many licenses, but I prefer to find open, or at least dongled, tools. It's easy to move the dongle between development machine, laptop, and the old clunker awaiting its moment of glory.

Entropy continues to exact its inevitable toll on those old machines fading into quiet obscurity in the closet. Insulation rots. Capacitors go bad. Moisture gets into the innards. It's important to turn the beasts on once in a while. I sure hope you use some sort of electronic organizer. A $45 product called Time & Chaos ( is my favorite. Program an action item that pops up once every year to remind you to give these machines just a bit of attention.

When the reminder pops up, check to see if any of the files need porting. Did you split the VCS database to minimize its size? If the company migrated to a different VCS it might be time to convert the old file. Yes, this is a pain, but viable products require some amount of maintenance.

If your debug tool of choice is an emulator, consider adding a dead-simple debug port like a BDM or ROM monitor. In 10 years maybe the emulator won't come back to life, but at least there's an alternative.

Code in boring ANSI C or C++. Don't use extensions; don't exercise all of the compiler's cool features. Remove all warnings and get a clean Lint. This means using explicit casting, too many parentheses, and the like. If you do have to change compilers for some reason, not stressing the language greatly reduces the effort required to get the code working with the new tool.

Help future coders
We're amazingly bad at documenting our work. Partly that's because our writing tools are so poor. The systems we build are so interrelated that any flat-file approach to codifying knowledge is awkward at best. I find that a Wiki ( is one of the easiest and most effective ways to document projects. The web-based Wiki offers utter simplicity, hypertext relations, and multi-user support. Like the VCS a Wiki lives on the company's server, so migrates from one generation of storage media to the next.

When the project is finally done, ask yourself some simple questions. In 10 years, when I'm called out of retirement to change this thing, what will I wish I had saved? What equipment will I wish I had? Documents? People? And how can I codify their knowledge now ?

As the Domesday Book showed, it's pretty hard to beat paper for documentation. Maybe the best strategy is to dump the entire source tree on punched cards.

Jack G. Ganssle is a lecturer and consultant on embedded development issues. He conducts seminars on embedded systems and helps companies with their embedded challenges. Contact him at .


  1. “Microsoft Warns: Lose Your Data—Lose Your Business,” Microsoft bCentral, London, England, October 15, 2003; posted on, October 16, 2003,
  2. Definition of write only memory,
  3. Longevity Planning, A Cost Reduction Strategy for Ground Systems of Long Duration Space Missions, Steven E. Gemeny

Reader Response

Our backup was a 1-week rotation of tapes from the local server. Iwent to reopen a project which I last worked on about 8 months ago,and the entire project folder was missing from the server! It took twosolid weeks to re-create the project. No one knows where or how thefolder got “lost”, but we did change to where we do a once-a-month”permanent” backup. I am hoping to get a CD or DVD burner in the nextcompany machine (of course, my home system has both!) but until then,I keep my working data on our server, and periodically back THAT up tomy local HD, which reminds me – I'm about due!

In all seriousness, I have read similar articles about the crisis inarchiving. It is ironic that paper, the medium that we have beentrying to drive out of our offices, is in many ways a more reliableform of storage than some of the electronic media. Perhaps paperlistings that can be subsequently “read” by a good OCR program (whichwould make the process independent of technology/OS issues) might besomething to think about. On the other hand – think about where you'regoing to make room for all that nice, temperature andhumidity-controlled storage space. Maybe I should start a newbusiness….

– Dave Telling

Don't get me on backwards compatibility! The latestPowerPoint [2003] – a tool I use every day – has a mysterious lack ofcompatibility with earlier ones. Slides can appear blank or they canlook fine, but print bad. Grrrrr.

– Colin Walls

Your comments are on the mark. Our legal department recently asked mefor the development files for a project I worked on 8 years ago. Wefound a utility that restores the *.QIC files I had archived underWIN95, but it only processed half of them. I'm still tyring to set upa Windows 95 system so I can restore the remaining files.

Another example: a couple of years ago our IT department updated thetools they use to backup corporate data. I subsequently tried torestore a file backed up with the previous equipment, only to be toldthat it was no longer available.

Save your data, save your tools, and periodically review them to seeif they need to be ported to a current system to keep them viable.

– Matthew Nichelson

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.